JOURNAL OF LIGHT INDUSTRY

CN 41-1437/TS  ISSN 2096-1553

不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展

韩书磊,张浩,陈欢,侯宏卫,胡清源

downloadPDF
韩书磊, 张浩, 陈欢, 等. 不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(4): 69-76. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.009
引用本文:韩书磊, 张浩, 陈欢, 等. 不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.doi:10.12187/2023.04.009
shu
HAN Shulei, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Huan, et al. Progress in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 69-76. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.009
Citation:HAN Shulei, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Huan, et al. Progress in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.doi:10.12187/2023.04.009
shu

不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展

  • 1. 北京生命科技研究院, 北京 102200;

  • 2. 烟草生物学效应重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450001;

  • 3. 国家烟草质量监督检验中心, 河南 郑州 450001

    • 作者简介:韩书磊(1983-),男,河南省许昌市人,北京生命科技研究院/国家烟草质量监督检验中心正高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为烟草化学生物学。E-mail:hsl1983@163.com;

  • 基金项目:中国烟草总公司重大专项项目（110202101018（XX-04），110202001007（XX-03））；国家烟草质量监督检验中心烟草控制框架公约科技项目（552018AQ0090）

  • 中图分类号:TS41+3

Progress in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine

  • 1. Beijing Life Science Academy, Beijing 102200, China;

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Tobacco Biological Effects, Zhengzhou 450001, China;

  • 3. China National Tobacco Quality Supervision & Test Center, Zhengzhou 450001, China

  • Received Date:2022-12-30
    Accepted Date:2023-03-20

    CLC number:TS41+3

  • 摘要:烟草及烟草制品中存在不同形态的烟碱，其含量的差异对烟草制品有较大影响。在概述烟碱形态的基础上，着重对不同形态烟碱在释放量和生理效应等方面的差异进行综述，指出：由于理化性质差异，烟草制品中的游离烟碱更易释放到气溶胶中；感官特性方面，游离烟碱的刺激性更高，烟碱盐相对更柔和；吸收率方面，由于存在多种给药方式，不同形态烟碱的吸收率存在差异；毒性方面，总体上游离烟碱毒性小于烟碱盐，但烟碱盐的毒性因酸根离子的种类而异；致瘾性方面，烟碱盐的致瘾性可能高于游离烟碱，且可能因酸根离子的种类而异。未来应对游离烟碱和烟碱盐的吸收率、毒性、致瘾性等生理效应的差异及潜在机制进行深入探究，以更好地指导烟碱盐在烟草制品中的应用。
    Abstract:There are different forms of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco products, and the differences in their contents significantly impact tobacco products. Based on a brief review of nicotine forms, the research on the differences in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine is reviewed. It pointed out that:due to differences in physicochemical properties, freebase nicotine in tobacco products is more easily released into the aerosol; in terms of sensory effects and freebase nicotine is more irritating, and nicotine salts are relatively softer; in terms of absorption rate, due to the existence of multiple modes of administration, the absorption rate of different forms of nicotine exists in terms of toxicity, free nicotine is generally less toxic than nicotine salts, but the toxicity of nicotine salts varies depending on the type of acid ions; in terms of addictiveness, nicotine salts may be more addictive than free nicotine and may vary depending on the type of acid ions. In the future, the differences in absorption rate, toxicity and addictive physiological effects of freebase nicotine and nicotine salts and their potential mechanisms should be thoroughly investigated to better guide the application of nicotine salts in tobacco products.
    1. [1]

      史宏志, 张建勋.烟草生物碱[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2004.

    2. [2]

      王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.

    3. [3]

      ASHLEY D L, PANKOW J F, TAVAKOLI A D, et al.Approaches, challenges, and experience in assessing free nicotine[J].Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 2009, 192:437-456.

    4. [4]

      CALLICUTT C H, COX R H, HSU F, et al.The role of ammonia in the transfer of nicotine from tobacco to mainstream smoke[J].Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2006, 46(1):1-17.

    5. [5]

      FAMELE M, PALMISANI J, FERRANTI C, et al.Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of nicotine and minor tobacco alkaloids in electronic cigarette refill liquids and second-hand generated aerosol[J].Journal of Separation Science, 2017, 40(5):1049-1056.

    6. [6]

      HAN S L, CHEN H, ZHANG X T, et al.Levels of selected groups of compounds in refill solutions for electronic cigarettes[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research:Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016, 18(5):708-714.

    7. [7]

      韩书磊, 陈欢, 刘彤, 等.气相色谱法分析电子烟烟液中主要生物碱含量[J].分析科学学报, 2015, 31(4):494-498.

    8. [8]

      HARVANKO A M, HAVEL C M, JACOB P, et al.Characterization of nicotine salts in 23 electronic cigarette refill liquids[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research:Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2020, 22(7):1239-43.

    9. [9]

      张浩, 韩书磊, 陈欢, 等.烟草及其制品中游离烟碱的测定方法研究进展[J].食品与机械, 2022, 38(4):234-240
      , 252.

    10. [10]

      HAN S L, CHEN H, SU Y, et al.Simultaneous quantification of nicotine salts in e-liquids by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS[J].Analytical Methods, 2022, 14(42):4185-4192.

    11. [11]

      ESCOBAR Y N, MORRISON C B, CHEN Y, et al.Differential responses to e-cig generated aerosols from humectants and different forms of nicotine in epithelial cells from nonsmokers and smokers[J].American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 2021, 320(6):1064-1073.

    12. [12]

      CLAYTON P M, VAS C A, BUI T T T, et al.Spectroscopic investigations into the acid-base properties of nicotine at different temperatures[J].Analytical Methods, 2013, 5(1):81-88.

    13. [13]

      王裔耿, 秦云华, 陆舍铭, 等.主流烟气总粒相物中游离烟碱测定方法综述[J].云南化工, 2007(4):59-62.

    14. [14]

      BENOWITZ N L, HUKKANEN J, JACOB P.Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers[J].Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 2009(192):29-60.

    15. [15]

      李国政, 邱建华, 周浩, 等.卷烟烟气pH值研究进展[J].食品与机械, 2017, 33(5):216-219.

    16. [16]

      韩富根.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2010.

    17. [17]

      吴继忠, 戴莉, 徐清泉, 等.烟碱形态与卷烟烟气粒相物pH的关联性研究[J].湖南农业大学学报, 2014, 40(3):253-6.

    18. [18]

      段焰青, 杨涛, 者为, 等.烟丝pH值的变化对卷烟烟气烟碱和感官质量的影响[J].烟草科技, 2008(4):39-41.

    19. [19]

      MORIE G P.Fraction of protonated and unprotonated nicotine in tobacco smoke at various pH values[J].Tobacco Science, 1972, 16:167.

    20. [20]

      卢斌斌, 谢剑平, 刘惠民.烟草中游离烟碱与其pH值之间的关系[J].烟草科技, 2003(6):6-10.

    21. [21]

      PANKOW J F.A consideration of the role of gas/particle partitioning in the deposition of nicotine and other tobacco smoke compounds in the respiratory tract[J].Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2001, 14(11):1465-1481.

    22. [22]

      EL-HELLANI A, EL-HAGE R, BAALBAKI R, et al.Free-base and protonated nicotine in electronic cigarette liquids and aerosols[J].Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2015, 28(8):1532-1537.

    23. [23]

      赵国玲, 尹新强, 黄建国, 等.不同形态烟碱在电子烟气溶胶中的释放研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(6):6-10.

    24. [24]

      韩敬美, 杨柳, 张子龙, 等.电子烟烟液pH与游离烟碱含量的关系研究[J].化学研究与应用, 2016, 28(3):295-300.

    25. [25]

      SEEMAN J I, FOURNIER J A, PAINE J B, et al.The form of nicotine in tobacco:The RMAL transfer of nicotine and nicotine acid salts to nicotine in the gas phase[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47(12):5133-5145.

    26. [26]

      SEEMAN J I, CARCHMAN R A.The possible role of ammonia toxicity on the exposure, deposition, retention, and the bioavailability of nicotine during smoking[J].Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2008, 46(6):1863-1881.

    27. [27]

      EL-HELLANI A, EL-HAGE R, SALMAN R, et al.Carboxylate counteranions in electronic cigarette liquids:influence on nicotine emissions[J].Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2017, 30(8):1577-1581.

    28. [28]

      PERFETTI T, NORMAN A, GORDON B, et al.The transfer of nicotine from nicotine salts to mainstream smoke[J].Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International, 2000, 19(3):141-158.

    29. [29]

      TALIH S, SALMAN R, EL-HAGE R, et al.Effect of free-base and protonated nicotine on nicotine yield from electronic cigarettes with varying power and liquid vehicle[J].Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):16263.

    30. [30]

      GHOLAP V V, PEARCY A C, HALQUIST M S.Potential factors affecting free base nicotine yield in electronic cigarette aerosols[J].Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2021, 18(7):979-989.

    31. [31]

      各会杰, 张博, 赵国玲, 等.不同烟碱盐对电子烟烟碱释放行为的影响[J].烟草科技, 2020, 53(3):59-66.

    32. [32]

      OMAIYE E E, MCWHIRTER K J, LUO W, et al.High-nicotine electronic cigarette products:Toxicity of JUUL fluids and aerosols correlates strongly with nicotine and some flavor chemical concentrations[J].Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2019, 32(6):1058-1069.

    33. [33]

      陈建潭, 李世杰, 王明锋, 等.卷烟烟气粒相物pH值、游离烟碱含量与卷烟劲头的关系[J].烟草科技, 2000(6):20-21.

    34. [34]

      王明锋, 曾晓鹰, 李先毅, 等.烤烟型卷烟主流烟气中烟碱、游离烟碱的量对感官舒适性的影响[J].食品工业, 2010, 31(3):27-31.

    35. [35]

      彭斌, 金征宇, 翁昔阳, 等.碳酸钾对卷烟主流烟气焦油、烟碱、游离烟碱、pH值及劲头的影响[J].烟草科技, 2007(7):8-10.

    36. [36]

      杨蕾, 杨清, 冯洪涛, 等.影响卷烟烟气柔和性的主要化学成分分析及柔和性功能香精的开发[J].烟草科技, 2011(7):5-9, 27.

    37. [37]

      LEVENTHAL A M, MADDEN D R, PERAZA N, et al.Effect of exposure to e-cigarettes with salt vs free-base nicotine on the appeal and sensory experience of vaping:A randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Network Open, 2021, 4(1):e2032757.

    38. [38]

      GHOLAP V V, KOSMIDER L, GOLSHAHI L, et al.Nicotine forms:Why and how do they matter in nicotine delivery from electronic cigarettes?[J].Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2020, 17(12):1-10.

    39. [39]

      HENNINGFIELD J, PANKOW J, GARRETT B.Ammonia and other chemical base tobacco additives and cigarette nicotine delivery:Issues and research needs[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2004, 6(2):199-205.

    40. [40]

      TAKANO M, NAGAHIRO M, YUMOTO R.Transport mechanism of nicotine in primary cultured alveolar epithelial cells[J].Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2016, 105(2):982-8.

    41. [41]

      TEGA Y, YUZURIHARA C, KUBO Y, et al.Functional expression of nicotine influx transporter in A549 human alveolar epithelial cells[J].Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2016, 31(1):99-101.

    42. [42]

      TAKANO M, KAMEI H, NAGAHIRO M, et al.Nicotine transport in lung and non-lung epithelial cells[J].Life Sciences, 2017, 188:76-82.

    43. [43]

      BURCH S G, GANN L P, OLSEN K M, et al.Effect of pH on nicotine absorption and side effects produced by aerosolized nicotine[J].Journal of Aerosol Medicine:Deposition, Clearance, and Effects in the Lung, 1993, 6:45-52.

    44. [44]

      BOWEN A, XING C, et al.Nicotine salt formulations for aerosol devices and methods thereof:AU2014262808-A1[P].2013-05-06.

    45. [45]

      O'CONNELL G, PRITCHARD J D, PRUE C, et al.A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt formulations in US adult smokers[J].Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2019, 14(6):853-861.

    46. [46]

      HENDERSON B J, COOPER S Y.Nicotine formulations impact reinforcement-related behaviors in a mouse model of vapor self-administration[J].Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2021, 224:108732.

    47. [47]

      ADRIAN C L, OLIN H B D, DALHOFF K, et al.In vivo human buccal permeability of nicotine[J].International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2006, 311(1/2):196-202.

    48. [48]

      WILHELM J, MISHINA E, VIRAY L, et al.The pH of smokeless tobacco determines nicotine buccal absorption:Results of a randomized crossover trial[J].Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2022, 111(5):1066-1074.

    49. [49]

      HAN S L, LIU C, CHEN H, et al.Pharmacokinetics of freebase nicotine and nicotine salts following subcutaneous administration in male rats[J/OL].Drug testing and analysis[2022-09-05].https://analyticalsciencejournals.onl-inelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/dta.3363.

    50. [50]

      LAUTERBACH J H, BAO M, JOZA P J, et al.Free-base nicotine in tobacco products.Part II. Determination of free-base nicotine in the aqueous extracts of smokeless tobacco products and the relevance of these findings to product design parameters[J].Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2011, 59(1):8-18.

    51. [51]

      GORI G B, BENOWITZ N L, LYNCH C J.Mouth versus deep airways absorption of nicotine in cigarette smokers[J].Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1986, 25(6):1181-1184.

    52. [52]

      VOOS N, GONIEWICZ M L, EISSENBERG T.What is the nicotine delivery profile of electronic cigarettes?[J].Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2019, 16(11):1193-1203.

    53. [53]

      SHAO X M, XU B, LIANG J, et al.Nicotine delivery to rats via lung alveolar region-targeted aerosol technology produces blood pharmacokinetics resembling human smoking[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2013, 15(7):1248-1258.

    54. [54]

      PHILLIPS B, ESPOSITO M, VERBEECK J, et al.Toxicity of aerosols of nicotine and pyruvic acid (separate and combined) in Sprague-Dawley rats in a 28-day OECD 412 inhalation study and assessment of systems toxicology[J].Inhalation Toxicology, 2015, 27(9):405-431.

    55. [55]

      WANG H J, CHEN H, HAN S L, et al.Cytotoxicity and acute toxicity assessment of several typical nicotine salts[C]//73rd Tobacco Science Research Conference.Leesburg, VA, USA:Lansdowne Resort and Spa, 2019:47.

    56. [56]

      ESCOBAR Y H, MORRISON C B, CHEN Y, et al.Differential responses to e-cig generated aerosols from humectants and different forms of nicotine in epithelial cells from nonsmokers and smokers[J].American Journal of Physiology Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 2021, 320(6):1064-1073.

    57. [57]

      GHOSH A, BEYAZCICEK O, DAVIS E S, et al.Cellular effects of nicotine salt-containing e-liquids[J].Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2021, 41(3):493-505.

    58. [58]

      ADDICOTT M A, SWEITZER M M, MCCLERNON F J.The Effects of nicotine and tobacco use on brain reward function:Interaction with nicotine dependence severity[J].Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2019, 21(6):764-771.

    59. [59]

      MILIANO C, SCOTT E R, MURDAUGH L B, et al.Modeling drug exposure in rodents using e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems[J].Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2020, 330:108458.

    60. [60]

      SHAO X M, FRIEDMAN T C.Pod-mod vs. conventional e-cigarettes:Nicotine chemistry, pH, and health effects[J].Journal of Applied Physiology, 2020, 128(4):1056-1058.

    61. [61]

      BARRINGTON-TRIMIS J L, LEVENTHAL A M.Adolescents' use of "pod mod" e-cigarettes:Urgent concerns[J].New England Journal of Medicine, 2018, 379(12):1099-1102.

    62. [62]

      JACKLER R K, RAMAMURTHI D.Nicotine arms race:JUUL and the high-nicotine product market[J].Tobacco Control, 2019, 28(6):623-628.

    63. [63]

      HAJEK P, PITTACCIO K, PESOLA F, et al.Nicotine delivery and users' reactions to Juul compared with cigarettes and other e-cigarette products[J].Addiction, 2020, 115(6):1141-1148.

    64. [64]

      HAJEK P, PRZULJ D, PHILLIPS A, et al.Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes[J].Psychopharmacology, 2017, 234(5):773-779.

  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • PDF下载量:36
  • 文章访问数:2682
  • 引证文献数:0
文章相关
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-30
  • 修回日期:2023-03-20
    通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1.

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    韩书磊, 张浩, 陈欢, 等. 不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(4): 69-76. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.009
    引用本文:韩书磊, 张浩, 陈欢, 等. 不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展[J]. 轻工学报, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.doi:10.12187/2023.04.009
    shu
    HAN Shulei, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Huan, et al. Progress in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 69-76. doi: 10.12187/2023.04.009
    Citation:HAN Shulei, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Huan, et al. Progress in the release and physiological effects of different forms of nicotine[J]. Journal of Light Industry, 2023, 38(4): 69-76.doi:10.12187/2023.04.009
    shu

    不同形态烟碱的释放和生理效应差异研究进展

      作者简介:韩书磊(1983-),男,河南省许昌市人,北京生命科技研究院/国家烟草质量监督检验中心正高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为烟草化学生物学。E-mail:hsl1983@163.com
    • 1. 北京生命科技研究院, 北京 102200;
    • 2. 烟草生物学效应重点实验室, 河南 郑州 450001;
    • 3. 国家烟草质量监督检验中心, 河南 郑州 450001
    • 收稿日期: 2022-12-30
    • 录用日期: 2023-03-20
    基金项目:中国烟草总公司重大专项项目（110202101018（XX-04），110202001007（XX-03））；国家烟草质量监督检验中心烟草控制框架公约科技项目（552018AQ0090）

    摘要:烟草及烟草制品中存在不同形态的烟碱，其含量的差异对烟草制品有较大影响。在概述烟碱形态的基础上，着重对不同形态烟碱在释放量和生理效应等方面的差异进行综述，指出：由于理化性质差异，烟草制品中的游离烟碱更易释放到气溶胶中；感官特性方面，游离烟碱的刺激性更高，烟碱盐相对更柔和；吸收率方面，由于存在多种给药方式，不同形态烟碱的吸收率存在差异；毒性方面，总体上游离烟碱毒性小于烟碱盐，但烟碱盐的毒性因酸根离子的种类而异；致瘾性方面，烟碱盐的致瘾性可能高于游离烟碱，且可能因酸根离子的种类而异。未来应对游离烟碱和烟碱盐的吸收率、毒性、致瘾性等生理效应的差异及潜在机制进行深入探究，以更好地指导烟碱盐在烟草制品中的应用。

    English Abstract

    参考文献 (64)

    目录

    /

      返回文章

      网站版权 © 轻工学报编辑部

      地址：河南省郑州市科学大道136号邮编：450001

      本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发 技术支持：info@rhhz.net